With the old checkpatch we cannot use the correct format for the
SPDX tags in the file .c, in fact the C99 comments are not allowed
and we had to use the block comment.
With the new checkpatch, let's switch to the correct SPDX format.
Change created automatically through the command:
sed -i \
's,^/\* *\(SPDX-License-Identifier: .*[^ ]\) *\*/$,// \1,' \
$(find src/ contrib/ -name \*.c)
Change-Id: I6da16506baa7af718947562505dd49606d124171
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7153
Tested-by: jenkins
Replace the FSF boilerplate with the SPDX tag.
The SPDX tag on files *.c is incorrect, as it should use the C99
single line comment using '//'. But current checkpatch doesn't
allow C99 comments, so keep using standard C comments, by now.
Change-Id: I255ad17235ff1e01bf0aa4deed4d944e1d693ddb
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7071
Tested-by: jenkins
Deassert the reset only if connect under reset is not required;
otherwise, assert the reset.
This fix aligns the behavior of connect under reset in dapdirect
with the behavior in jtag and swd.
Change-Id: I937ef4320b44e51ef6cb0e349e12348dbfbe4abb
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5415
Tested-by: jenkins
Some high level adapters, like STLINK-V3 and new firmware for
ST-Link/V2, provide API to directly access the DAP registers
hiding the details of the physical transport JTAG or SWD.
OpenOCD has already the intermediate API in struct dap_ops that
are suitable for such adapters, but are not exposed to the
adapter drivers.
Add in struct adapter_driver two independent struct dap_ops for
the cases of physical JTAG and SWD transport.
Add new transport names "dapdirect_jtag" and "dapdirect_swd", to
be used by the drivers that provide one or both DAP API.
Add the necessarily glue in target/adi_v5_dapdirect.c
Change-Id: I2bb8e3a80fba750f2c218d877cfa5888428e3c28
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4903
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
