mirror of
				https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux
				synced 2025-11-04 16:52:06 +10:00 
			
		
		
		
	The document is largely not the same as the original that was crafted from Frohwalt Egerer's document, but leave it in as a historical thank you footnote. Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
		
			
				
	
	
		
			175 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			175 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.3 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
Background
 | 
						|
==========
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The upstream Linux kernel maintainers only fix bugs for specific kernel
 | 
						|
versions.  Those versions include the current "release candidate" (or -rc)
 | 
						|
kernel, any "stable" kernel versions, and any "long term" kernels.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Please see https://www.kernel.org/ for a list of supported kernels.  Any
 | 
						|
kernel marked with [EOL] is "end of life" and will not have any fixes
 | 
						|
backported to it.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you've found a bug on a kernel version isn't listed on kernel.org,
 | 
						|
contact your Linux distribution or embedded vendor for support.
 | 
						|
Alternatively, you can attempt to run one of the supported stable or -rc
 | 
						|
kernels, and see if you can reproduce the bug on that.  It's preferable
 | 
						|
to reproduce the bug on the latest -rc kernel.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
How to report Linux kernel bugs
 | 
						|
===============================
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Identify the problematic subsystem
 | 
						|
----------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Identifying which part of the Linux kernel might be causing your issue
 | 
						|
increases your chances of getting your bug fixed. Simply posting to the
 | 
						|
generic linux-kernel mailing list (LKML) may cause your bug report to be
 | 
						|
lost in the noise of a mailing list that gets 1000+ emails a day.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Instead, try to figure out which kernel subsystem is causing the issue,
 | 
						|
and email that subsystem's maintainer and mailing list.  If the subsystem
 | 
						|
maintainer doesn't answer, then expand your scope to mailing lists like
 | 
						|
LKML.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Identify who to notify
 | 
						|
----------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Once you know the subsystem that is causing the issue, you should send a
 | 
						|
bug report.  Some maintainers prefer bugs to be reported via bugzilla
 | 
						|
(https://bugzilla.kernel.org), while others prefer that bugs be reported
 | 
						|
via the subsystem mailing list.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
To find out where to send an emailed bug report, find your subsystem or
 | 
						|
device driver in the MAINTAINERS file.  Search in the file for relevant
 | 
						|
entries, and send your bug report to the person(s) listed in the "M:"
 | 
						|
lines, making sure to Cc the mailing list(s) in the "L:" lines.  When the
 | 
						|
maintainer replies to you, make sure to 'Reply-all' in order to keep the
 | 
						|
public mailing list(s) in the email thread.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you know which driver is causing issues, you can pass one of the driver
 | 
						|
files to the get_maintainer.pl script:
 | 
						|
     perl scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f <filename>
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If it is a security bug, please copy the Security Contact listed in the
 | 
						|
MAINTAINERS file.  They can help coordinate bugfix and disclosure.  See
 | 
						|
Documentation/SecurityBugs for more information.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you can't figure out which subsystem caused the issue, you should file
 | 
						|
a bug in kernel.org bugzilla and send email to
 | 
						|
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, referencing the bugzilla URL.  (For more
 | 
						|
information on the linux-kernel mailing list see
 | 
						|
http://www.tux.org/lkml/).
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Tips for reporting bugs
 | 
						|
-----------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If you haven't reported a bug before, please read:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html
 | 
						|
http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
It's REALLY important to report bugs that seem unrelated as separate email
 | 
						|
threads or separate bugzilla entries.  If you report several unrelated
 | 
						|
bugs at once, it's difficult for maintainers to tease apart the relevant
 | 
						|
data.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Gather information
 | 
						|
------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The most important information in a bug report is how to reproduce the
 | 
						|
bug.  This includes system information, and (most importantly)
 | 
						|
step-by-step instructions for how a user can trigger the bug.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
If the failure includes an "OOPS:", take a picture of the screen, capture
 | 
						|
a netconsole trace, or type the message from your screen into the bug
 | 
						|
report.  Please read "Documentation/oops-tracing.txt" before posting your
 | 
						|
bug report. This explains what you should do with the "Oops" information
 | 
						|
to make it useful to the recipient.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
This is a suggested format for a bug report sent via email or bugzilla.
 | 
						|
Having a standardized bug report form makes it easier for you not to
 | 
						|
overlook things, and easier for the developers to find the pieces of
 | 
						|
information they're really interested in.  If some information is not
 | 
						|
relevant to your bug, feel free to exclude it.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
First run the ver_linux script included as scripts/ver_linux, which
 | 
						|
reports the version of some important subsystems.  Run this script with
 | 
						|
the command "sh scripts/ver_linux".
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Use that information to fill in all fields of the bug report form, and
 | 
						|
post it to the mailing list with a subject of "PROBLEM: <one line
 | 
						|
summary from [1.]>" for easy identification by the developers.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
 | 
						|
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
 | 
						|
[3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel):
 | 
						|
[4.] Kernel information
 | 
						|
[4.1.] Kernel version (from /proc/version):
 | 
						|
[4.2.] Kernel .config file:
 | 
						|
[5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug:
 | 
						|
[6.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information
 | 
						|
     resolved (see Documentation/oops-tracing.txt)
 | 
						|
[7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the
 | 
						|
     problem (if possible)
 | 
						|
[8.] Environment
 | 
						|
[8.1.] Software (add the output of the ver_linux script here)
 | 
						|
[8.2.] Processor information (from /proc/cpuinfo):
 | 
						|
[8.3.] Module information (from /proc/modules):
 | 
						|
[8.4.] Loaded driver and hardware information (/proc/ioports, /proc/iomem)
 | 
						|
[8.5.] PCI information ('lspci -vvv' as root)
 | 
						|
[8.6.] SCSI information (from /proc/scsi/scsi)
 | 
						|
[8.7.] Other information that might be relevant to the problem
 | 
						|
       (please look in /proc and include all information that you
 | 
						|
       think to be relevant):
 | 
						|
[X.] Other notes, patches, fixes, workarounds:
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Follow up
 | 
						|
=========
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Expectations for bug reporters
 | 
						|
------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Linux kernel maintainers expect bug reporters to be able to follow up on
 | 
						|
bug reports.  That may include running new tests, applying patches,
 | 
						|
recompiling your kernel, and/or re-triggering your bug.  The most
 | 
						|
frustrating thing for maintainers is for someone to report a bug, and then
 | 
						|
never follow up on a request to try out a fix.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
That said, it's still useful for a kernel maintainer to know a bug exists
 | 
						|
on a supported kernel, even if you can't follow up with retests.  Follow
 | 
						|
up reports, such as replying to the email thread with "I tried the latest
 | 
						|
kernel and I can't reproduce my bug anymore" are also helpful, because
 | 
						|
maintainers have to assume silence means things are still broken.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Expectations for kernel maintainers
 | 
						|
-----------------------------------
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Linux kernel maintainers are busy, overworked human beings.  Some times
 | 
						|
they may not be able to address your bug in a day, a week, or two weeks.
 | 
						|
If they don't answer your email, they may be on vacation, or at a Linux
 | 
						|
conference.  Check the conference schedule at LWN.net for more info:
 | 
						|
	https://lwn.net/Calendar/
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
In general, kernel maintainers take 1 to 5 business days to respond to
 | 
						|
bugs.  The majority of kernel maintainers are employed to work on the
 | 
						|
kernel, and they may not work on the weekends.  Maintainers are scattered
 | 
						|
around the world, and they may not work in your time zone.  Unless you
 | 
						|
have a high priority bug, please wait at least a week after the first bug
 | 
						|
report before sending the maintainer a reminder email.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
The exceptions to this rule are regressions, kernel crashes, security holes,
 | 
						|
or userspace breakage caused by new kernel behavior.  Those bugs should be
 | 
						|
addressed by the maintainers ASAP.  If you suspect a maintainer is not
 | 
						|
responding to these types of bugs in a timely manner (especially during a
 | 
						|
merge window), escalate the bug to LKML and Linus Torvalds.
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
Thank you!
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
[Some of this is taken from Frohwalt Egerer's original linux-kernel FAQ]
 |