mirror of
https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
synced 2025-09-27 17:32:00 +10:00
btrfs: populate otime when logging an inode item
[ Upstream commit1ef94169db
] [TEST FAILURE WITH EXPERIMENTAL FEATURES] When running test case generic/508, the test case will fail with the new btrfs shutdown support: generic/508 - output mismatch (see /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad) # --- tests/generic/508.out 2022-05-11 11:25:30.806666664 +0930 # +++ /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad 2025-07-02 14:53:22.401824212 +0930 # @@ -1,2 +1,6 @@ # QA output created by 508 # Silence is golden # +Before: # +After : stat.btime = Thu Jan 1 09:30:00 1970 # +Before: # +After : stat.btime = Wed Jul 2 14:53:22 2025 # ... # (Run 'diff -u /home/adam/xfstests/tests/generic/508.out /home/adam/xfstests/results//generic/508.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/508 Failures: generic/508 Failed 1 of 1 tests Please note that the test case requires shutdown support, thus the test case will be skipped using the current upstream kernel, as it doesn't have shutdown ioctl support. [CAUSE] The direct cause the 0 time stamp in the log tree: leaf 30507008 items 2 free space 16057 generation 9 owner TREE_LOG leaf 30507008 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored e522548d checksum calced e522548d fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0 chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398 item 0 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 9 transid 9 size 0 nbytes 0 block group 0 mode 100644 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 1 flags 0x0(none) atime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) ctime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) mtime 1751432947.492000000 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) otime 0.0 (1970-01-01 09:30:00) <<< But the old fs tree has all the correct time stamp: btrfs-progs v6.12 fs tree key (FS_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0) leaf 30425088 items 2 free space 16061 generation 5 owner FS_TREE leaf 30425088 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1 checksum stored 48f6c57e checksum calced 48f6c57e fs uuid 57d45451-481e-43e4-aa93-289ad707a3a0 chunk uuid d52bd3fd-5163-4337-98a7-7986993ad398 item 0 key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160 generation 3 transid 0 size 0 nbytes 16384 block group 0 mode 40755 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0 sequence 0 flags 0x0(none) atime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) ctime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) mtime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) otime 1751432947.0 (2025-07-02 14:39:07) <<< The root cause is that fill_inode_item() in tree-log.c is only populating a/c/m time, not the otime (or btime in statx output). Part of the reason is that, the vfs inode only has a/c/m time, no native btime support yet. [FIX] Thankfully btrfs has its otime stored in btrfs_inode::i_otime_sec and btrfs_inode::i_otime_nsec. So what we really need is just fill the otime time stamp in fill_inode_item() of tree-log.c There is another fill_inode_item() in inode.c, which is doing the proper otime population. Fixes:94edf4ae43
("Btrfs: don't bother committing delayed inode updates when fsyncing") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ timespec changes in older tree ] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a803d916ae
commit
dd83b2be69
@ -4000,6 +4000,11 @@ static void fill_inode_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
|
||||
btrfs_set_token_timespec_nsec(&token, &item->ctime,
|
||||
inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec);
|
||||
|
||||
btrfs_set_token_timespec_sec(&token, &item->otime,
|
||||
BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime.tv_sec);
|
||||
btrfs_set_token_timespec_nsec(&token, &item->otime,
|
||||
BTRFS_I(inode)->i_otime.tv_nsec);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We do not need to set the nbytes field, in fact during a fast fsync
|
||||
* its value may not even be correct, since a fast fsync does not wait
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user